|
From: constituent_reply@landrieu.senate.gov January 15, 2008 Mr. Chuck Lemieux Dear Mr. Lemieux: Thank you for contacting me regarding our nation’s current immigration laws and securing our borders. I appreciate hearing from you and apologize for the delay in my response. The automatic citizenship of individuals born in the United States was an essential element of the Constitution and served an important purpose in the beginning of our nation. Section 1 of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution states “[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” Today, we are faced with the issue of how to apply this Constitutional right to babies of illegal immigrants. I agree that we must stem the tide of illegal immigration into our country. Recent events have increased funding for this effort, aiding the Border Patrol and the Immigration and Naturalization Service in preventing illegal entry. As you may know, Congressman Nathan Deal has introduced H.R. 1940, the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2007. This bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to consider a person born in the United States “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States for citizenship at birth purposes if the person is born in the United States of parents, one of whom is (1) a U.S. citizen or national; (2) a lawful permanent resident alien whose residence is in the United States; or (3) an alien performing active service in the armed forces. This bill is currently before the House Judiciary Committee. This bill is currently be reviewed by the House Judiciary Committee. I assure you that I will keep your thoughts in mind should this legislation come before the full Senate for a vote. I wanted to let you know that I agree that we need to increase security along the border. In this vein, I cosponsored an amendment to the Homeland Security Appropriations bill that added $3 billion to the Department of Homeland Security’s budget for border security. This amendment was successfully added to the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill. You may also be interested to know that I, along with Senator Mark Pryor, have introduced the Secure America through Verification and Enforcement Act (SAVE Act). The legislation provides a three-pronged approach to reducing illegal immigration. First, it strengthens border security by increasing border patrol agents by 8,000 over 5 years and employing new technology available, including satellite communication and aerial surveillance. Second, the SAVE Act expands and mandates use of the E-verify program -- a free and effective program that allows employers to verify the individuals they hire are legally allowed to work in the U.S. The program will be phased-in over four years, beginning with the federal government, federal contractors, and employers with more than 250 employees. Smaller businesses would begin using the system in a graduated manner. Third, the legislation enables law enforcement, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), to enforce existing federal laws by providing them with the staff, training, resources and infrastructure necessary to do their jobs. Finally, I wanted to let you know that I wanted to let you know that I voted against cloture on the immigration bill that the Senate considered earlier this year. My vote against cloture helped prevent the legislation from coming to a vote on the floor of the U.S. Senate. I voted “no” because the floor debate and amendment process failed to produce a balanced bill. I was especially concerned that the guest worker program proposed in the bill was virtually unenforceable and that its structure did little to help employers short on skilled workers. Instead, it encouraged overstaying and more illegal behavior. In addition, the legalization rules in the bill gave greater preference for those in the country illegally than for authorized guest workers or family members of U.S. citizens who are trying to immigrate legally. To me, that was fundamentally unfair. If we provide a path to earned citizenship, the first people in line should be those who have played by the rules and followed the law. Furthermore, since Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the citizens of Louisiana have seen the Department of Homeland Security be unwilling or unable to implement quick and effective reform when it is needed or directed by Congress. This bill called upon the agency to absorb yet another hefty responsibility with little consideration for the resources, accountability, and a realistic time line necessary to make it happen. In light of our experiences in Louisiana, I had serious reservations whether the Department of Homeland Security would have been able to implement many of the reforms set forth in the bill in such a tight time frame. Throughout the debate over the last several weeks, I tried to improve the bill through the amendment process. For example, I voted for the Dorgan Amendment to eliminate the temporary guest worker program and for the Bingaman Amendment to cut the number of temporary guest workers from 400,000 to 200,000 per year, which passed the Senate. I also supported an amendment to eliminate the portion of the bill that would have legalized currently illegal immigrants residing in the country. Finally, I voted to strengthen the border security triggers that must be in place before the temporary guest worker program can begin. Unfortunately, these measures failed to garner the necessary number of votes to be included in the legislation. I remain committed to providing every necessary resource to enforce our immigration laws and to help American workers and businesses to prosper and thrive. I appreciate the opportunity to hear from you about this important matter, and I hope you will continue to contact me on issues of mutual concern. Please feel free to also visit my website at http://www.senate.gov/~landrieu for more information on legislative affairs.
Sincerely, Mary L. Landrieu |
|