STATE OF LOUISIANA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT
M.
J "MIKE" FOSTER, JR. GOVERNOR
P.O. Box 831
Baton
Rouge, Louisiana 70821-0831 (225) 231-4131, Fax (225) 231-4108
January 6, 2000
KAM MOVASSAGHI SECRETARY
Speed
Zone
La 74
(I-10- La 73) Control 264 Section 03 Community of Dutchtown Ascension Parish
District 61
Ref
03-99-301
Mr. Chuck LeMieux 13085 Depen Road Gonzales, LA 70737
Dear
Mr. LeMieux:
This
is in response to your November 12, 1999 letter to Mr. William Temple
appealing the Department's denial of your request to lower the speed limit on
La 74, and other attachments written by you to local officials on this same
subject. You appear to be listing the following points in your writings as
indications that a lower speed limit is justified:
1. Dutchtown
School Road intersecting La 74, and school related traffic
2. Day
Care center located nearby, and school children being shuttled between it and
the school
3. Heavy
plant traffic in the area which overlaps school traffic
4. Comparison
with Cornerview Road and La 021
As a
citizen of Louisiana you are certainly entitled to know the reasoning behind
our answers, so I will provide this in the following points:
.
Speed
Limit Policy: Speed
Limit studies involve the collection of speed data, sampling 100 or more
vehicles at one or more locations along the highway section. An engineer will
make a visual inspection of the route, driving it in both directions,
assessing the type of roadside development, traffic and pedestrian activity,
type of traffic control at intersecting streets, accident data, road surface,
shoulder conditions and alignment. Our design policy establishes the 85th
percentile speed as the primary factor in determining speed limits. This is
the speed that captures 85% of the motorists sampled (only 15% exceed this
speed). Our policy states that speed limits should generally be set at the
85th percentile speed, which is a nationwide engineering practice, though not
without exception.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER A DRUG FREE WORKPLACE
Mr
Chuck LeMieux
January
6, 2000
Page 2
2. Schools and Day Care Centers: Day Care centers do not figure prominently as a
consideration for setting speed limits because the children are car passengers
that are not exposed to any unreasonable danger when attended by reasonably
prudent drivers. It is obviously impossible to design highways to protect
against all driver error. All of us who have driven for any length of time
have made mistakes that could have killed us had we not been more fortunate.
Schools are typically addressed by school speed zones. Our criteria for school
speed zones is that the school must (1) be located adjacent to a state route
(school property adjoins right-of-way), and (2) there must be an established
school crossing (child pedestrians) on the state route. It is noted that the
absence of the second criteria once again involves children only as car
passengers.
3. Heavy Plant Traffic: Heavy peak traffic is not a reason for reducing a speed
limit. In fact, heavy traffic tends to reduce speeds without the need for a
speed limit reduction. It would be unrealistic to reduce a speed limit to
attempt to force rush-hour traffic speeds during off-peak traffic periods.
4~ Comparison with La 621 & Cornerview Road: Below
is a summary of speed data for La 621, La 3038 (Cornerview Road), and La 74,
and the speed limit requests and disposition for each, of the 3 recent studies
(all speed data in mph). Another important parameter in speed studies is the
10 mph pace speed, Speed limits are typically not set below the 85th
percentile speed or the upper limit of the 10 mph pace speed, which can be
thought of as a 10 mph sliding window that stops at the point where it
captures the most vehicles:
La
621
La
3039 (Cornerview Rd)
Request
to reduce speed limit - denied Request to reduce speed limit - denied
Route Posted
Speed Speed Range 50th %lie 85th %lie 10 mph p~ce Ave Speed
621
55
36 -60
45
51
40- 49
45.9
3038
30
25-45
33
38
27-36
33
3038
35
25-43
33
37
29-38
33
74
55
32-64
48
55
43-52
47.8
Although
there are certain site-specific conditions that may override the 85th percentile
speed, it is a very reliable parameter in setting speed limits, because it
represents the comfortable driving speed for the majority of motorists.
Accordingly, speed limits set higher than the 85th percentile and upper limit of
the 10 mph pace speed tend to be unsafe, and speed limits set below these
parameters tend to have poor compliance and are not enforceable. I have noted on
many occasions the general public's very strong perception that people tend to
drive 5 mph over the speed limit, and if you lower the speed limit from 55 mph
to 45 mph for example, people will lower their driving speed from 60 mph to 50
mph.
Mr.
Chuck LeMieux
January
6, 2000
Page 3
This
simply has not been born out in our studies. The dynamic between posted speeds
and driving practice can be somewhat complicated. What typically happens when
speed limits are lowered to an unreasonably Iow speed, is that the more timid
drivers and law abiding drivers tend to lower their speeds, and the 85th
percentile speed changes very little (maybe only by I or 2 mph in many cases).
The average speed lowers primarily because of the downward shift in the tow-end
speeds. This can create an unsafe condition by increasing the speed range, which
makes passing more tempting due to the slower speeds of the Iow-end motorists.
This is the "Catch-22" of lowering speed limits, in addition to it
being ineffective in reducing the speeds of most motorists. You will note that
the 85th percentire speed measured for La 74 was 55 mph which corresponds to its
current posting, and which is the appropriate posting for this section of
roadway.
Sincerely,
DISTRICT
ENGINEER ADMINISTRATOR
RDC:rdc
cc: Dr. Kam Movassaghi Mr. John Basilica Mr. Roddy
Dillon Mr. William Temple Mr. Karl Finch Mr~ Peter Aliain
AN
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER A DRUG FREE WORKPLACE